Category · AI Citation Index

HR

The HR software category shows strong consensus around established platforms, with 153 brands recognized but only 12 undergoing formal evaluation. BambooHR and Workday Talent Management tie at 64% shortlist rates, though BambooHR achieves this with broader model agreement (diversity=5 vs 4). Rippling follows closely at 58%, positioning itself as a strong alternative with full model consensus. The category exhibits a clear tiering: top-tier platforms (BambooHR, Rippling, builtforteams.com) maintain shortlist rates above 50%, while mid-tier solutions (Lattice, Culture Amp, 15Five, Hibob) cluster between 26-40%, suggesting functional adequacy but less universal appeal.

672 discovery queries · 649 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 672 buyer-style "HR" queries

3%10%18%25%33%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces68%73%78%83%89%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for HR sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Comprehensive
42/42
2Workday
41/42
3Built
35/42
4SAP
33/42
5Adp
32/42
1Built
24/25
2Bamboohr
21/25
3Adp
21/25
4UKG Pro
21/25
5Hourly
20/25
1Workday
22/22
2Bamboohr
21/22
3Rippling
18/22
4Built
18/22
5Paylocity
16/22
1Rippling
20/20
2Deel
19/20
3Bamboohr
18/20
4Comprehensive
15/20
5Ideal
15/20
1Bamboohr
15/17
2Rippling
15/17
3Hibob
11/17
4Workday
10/17
5Lattice
10/17
1Rippling
9/9
2Bamboohr
9/9
3Ideal
8/9
4Ease
8/9
5Hibob
8/9
1Goals
7/7
2Built
7/7
3Workday
7/7
4Bonusly
7/7
5Nectar
7/7
1Comprehensive
6/6
2Built
6/6
3Recommend
5/6
4Central
4/6
5Ideal
4/6
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · hr

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand018375573Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across HR prompt runs.

Vendor pages

267

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

215

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top HR questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Trust

Buyers checking credibility

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for HR?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full HR leaderboard →