[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Paycom
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

20

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

41

across 397 prompts

AI Share of Voice

41%

across 397 prompts

Category Visibility

#16

in Payroll · of 50

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
235 category
Cited41%96/235
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors11.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Paycom is visible in

2
  • Payroll16 of 50→
  • HRIS19 of 106→

Executive summary

Paycom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Paycom vs ADP/Gusto/Workday”) because it has first-party comparison pages and strong third-party review presence (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, and Gartner Peer Insights). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, specific pricing (or pricing ranges) on paycom.com—right now, AI engines appear to struggle to cite pricing directly from the brand domain.

Based on audit of paycom.com · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy