AEO Audit is a free tool that scores B2B SaaS websites for AI search visibility — how likely they are to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews when B2B buyers search.

What is AI Engine Optimization (AEO)?

AI Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring content, entity signals, and technical infrastructure so that AI engines cite your brand in generated answers. It extends traditional SEO to cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.

Yes. AEO Audit is free. Enter any B2B SaaS brand and receive a full AI visibility score with prioritised recommendations.

How does AEO Audit score websites?

AEO Audit scores across six pillars: AI Visibility (22%), Brand Authority (23%), Content Quality (18%), Platform Optimization (15%), Structured Data (12%), and Technical AEO (10%). Each pillar reflects specific signals that AI engines use when deciding which sources to cite.

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Learning Management

Discovery is a three-way race. TalentLMS, Moodle, and Workday Talent Management each surface across every AI engine, with TalentLMS edging ahead at 88% of buyer queries and Moodle at 84%. Workday Talent Management (the riser) trails at 71% but wins more head-to-heads than it loses. The tail is long — practice.do, Blackboard, and Teachable each surface in roughly a quarter to a third of discovery prompts — and evaluation is contested: Leapsome, Mindtickle, and Personio Performance & Development (all kingmakers) trade head-to-head wins with no clear winner, while Workday Talent Management loses every comparison query despite its strong discovery share. This is a fragmented category where AI attention is split across open-source platforms, legacy academic systems, and enterprise HR suites, with no consensus pick yet.

49 discovery queries · 66 head-to-heads · refreshed May 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 49 buyer-style "Learning Management" queries

Most cited · Learning ManagementLive

TalentLMS

talentlms.com

Cited in 43 of 49 buyer questions for Learning Management — surfaced by 3 of 3 AI engines.

ChatGPTGeminiClaude

Citation rate

88%

See the full TalentLMS profile→

TalentLMS and Moodle capture eyeballs in nearly nine out of ten buyer queries and surface on every engine we track (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini). Workday Talent Management shows up in 71% of discovery prompts across all engines, but practice.do, Blackboard, and Teachable each surface in less than half of queries and skip at least one engine. Google Classroom and Rippling round out the tail, each appearing in fewer than one in five discovery prompts despite four-engine visibility.

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions

Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Learning Management sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

TalentLMS

6/6

Workday

6/6

Moodle

4/6

Practice

3/6

Docebo

3/6

TalentLMS

5/5

Moodle

5/5

Practice

5/5

Workday

4/5

Cornerstone OnDemand

1/5

TalentLMS

5/5

Moodle

5/5

Blackboard

4/5

Workday

2/5

Practice

2/5

Moodle

4/5

TalentLMS

4/5

Blackboard

3/5

Schoology

2/5

Google Classroom

2/5

360Learning

4/4

Docebo

4/4

Practice

4/4

Moodle

4/4

Absorb LMS

3/4

Workday

4/4

TalentLMS

4/4

Moodle

4/4

NAVEX One

3/4

Traliant

3/4

Blackboard

4/4

Moodle

4/4

Google Classroom

3/4

Schoology

2/4

Practice

2/4

TalentLMS

4/4

Moodle

4/4

Teachable

3/4

Workday

3/4

Practice

3/4

≥50% cited

25–49%

<25%

Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · learning-management

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 49/100

When buyers ask AI to compare learning management options head-to-head, Leapsome wins more matchups than it loses across a dozen comparison queries, while Personio Performance & Development and Mindtickle each lose more than they win in the same number of fights. Workday Talent Management — despite its strong discovery share — loses every head-to-head comparison AI surfaces, a disconnect between visibility and picked-answer performance. Awarathon trails the pack in evaluation scores across ten comparison queries.

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure

Median citation rate 49/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Brands to know

In this category

TalentLMS

Cloud LMS for SMB corporate training

Read brand profile →

Workday Talent Management

Riser

Enterprise HR suite with learning module

Read brand profile →

Leapsome

Kingmaker

People enablement platform with learning workflows

Read brand profile →

Mindtickle

Kingmaker

Sales readiness and enablement platform

Read brand profile →

Personio Performance & Development

Kingmaker

European HRIS with performance and learning modules

Read brand profile →

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

681 citations captured across Learning Management prompt runs.

Vendor pages

270

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

205

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Learning Management questions

Every query in this category is top-of-funnel exploration. Buyers ask AI for learning management systems by use case ('corporate training', 'employee progress tracking') and role ('director of training enhancing learner engagement with technology'). None of the prompts we captured dug into head-to-head comparisons, pricing, or trust signals — the entire audit set is discovery-stage 'what are my options' questions.