Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Applicant Tracking
Greenhouse and Lever tie at ~65% shortlist rates; 349 vendors compete; Lever +14 momentum, Jobma -63.
180 discovery queries · 304 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 19, 2026
Discovery stage
The shortlist
Across 180 buyer-style "Applicant Tracking" queries
Greenhouse (65.0% shortlist rate, 392 mentions) and Lever (64.4%, 366 mentions) lead a tight race across 180 prompts. Workday (61.7%) and iCIMS (60.0%) follow, while Ashbyhq (56.1%) and Workable (47.2%) round out the consensus tier. All top six appear across all four LLM models tested.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Get weekly AI visibility changes for Applicant Tracking sent to your inbox.
Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.
Signal by intent
By topic
Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.
Evaluation stage
Head-to-head
How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 5/100
Greenhouse, Lever, and BambooHR each average 48 points in head-to-head comparisons, the category high. iCIMS (47) and Ashby (47) trail by a single point, while Workday and SmartRecruiters share 45. The median evaluation score across all brands is just 5, underscoring how heavily LLMs favor the top eight.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.
Trends
Over the last 12 months
Lever gained 14 points month-over-month, the sharpest climb in the category. Jobma collapsed 63 points, the steepest fall. Monthly average scores swing wildly—71 in July (4 samples), 9 in October (56 samples)—reflecting thin early data and growing query volume.
Brands to know
In this category
Calendly
Calendly scores 78, the highest in the category, despite being a scheduling tool. LLMs cite it for interview-coordination workflows that sit adjacent to core ATS features.
Read brand profile →Workable
Workable earns a 72 score and 47.2% shortlist rate, positioning it as the SMB-friendly alternative to enterprise leaders Greenhouse and Lever.
Read brand profile →Lever
Lever's 66 score pairs with a +14 momentum delta, signaling sustained AI model preference. It appears in 64.4% of shortlists and draws 366 total mentions.
Read brand profile →Ashbyhq
Ashbyhq (63 score, 56.1% shortlist rate) and Ashby (47 evaluation score) both rank in top tiers, suggesting LLMs treat the rebrand as continuous signal rather than a split.
Read brand profile →Greenhouse
Greenhouse holds the highest shortlist rate (65.0%) and 392 mentions, yet scores 62—below Calendly and Workable. LLMs cite it most often but reserve top scores for niche-fit scenarios.
Read brand profile →Citation sources
Where AI pulls citations from
654 citations captured across Applicant Tracking prompt runs.
Vendor pages
189Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors
Independent sources
189Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned
Buyer questions
What AI cites for top Applicant Tracking questions
Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.
Discovery
Buyers exploring the category- Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in 2026: Compared & Ranked | Frankland Automationfranklandautomation.com
- Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in 2026: Compared & Rankedtheundercoverrecruiter.com
- 10 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) of 2026 - People Managing Peoplepeoplemanagingpeople.com
Evaluation
Buyers comparing options- 24 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS): Full Comparison 2026selectsoftwarereviews.com
- top-ats-software-integrationshrmless.com
Want to know if AI cites your brand for Applicant Tracking?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →