AI Visibility
measured72/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
22
across 608 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 589 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Lever is visible in
3Executive summary
Lever is highly likely to be cited for category shortlists because it has ~2,102 G2 reviews at 4.3★ and first-party comparison pages for multiple evaluation queries (e.g., “How does Lever compare to Workable?”). The biggest AI-citation risk is pricing: Lever’s pricing is “available upon request” (no public tiers/prices), which blocks strong citation for “How much does Lever cost?” and weakens evaluation-stage answers that require concrete pricing evidence.
Based on audit of lever.co · Apr 2, 2026