[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Lever
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

50

across 946 prompts

AI Share of Voice

51%

across 927 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Applicant Tracking · of 123

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
650 category
Cited64%416/650
Share of voice56%avg
Engine consensus59%of engines
Competitors12.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited15%2/13
Share of voice15%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited50%4/8
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Lever is visible in

3
  • Applicant Tracking2 of 123→
  • AI Recruiting3 of 111→
  • HR15 of 278→

Executive summary

Lever is highly likely to be cited for category shortlists because it has ~2,102 G2 reviews at 4.3★ and first-party comparison pages for multiple evaluation queries (e.g., “How does Lever compare to Workable?”). The biggest AI-citation risk is pricing: Lever’s pricing is “available upon request” (no public tiers/prices), which blocks strong citation for “How much does Lever cost?” and weakens evaluation-stage answers that require concrete pricing evidence.

Based on audit of lever.co · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy