[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Hibob
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

40

across 712 prompts

AI Share of Voice

39%

across 691 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in HRIS · of 106

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
479 category
Cited58%277/479
Share of voice43%avg
Engine consensus47%of engines
Competitors13.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited92%11/12
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Hibob is visible in

2
  • HR5 of 131→
  • HRIS6 of 106→

Executive summary

HiBob is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for “best HRIS software” and “alternatives to HiBob” because it has strong G2 presence (2314 reviews, 4.5★) and active third-party citation surfaces (e.g., Reddit discussions and Wikipedia). The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage query coverage: HiBob appears to rely on blog-style comparison content rather than clearly indexable first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages for each competitor (Rippling, BambooHR, Personio, Workday), and public pricing is not clearly crawlable as a tiered pricing page.

Based on audit of hibob.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy