AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
70
across 787 prompts
AI Share of Voice
70%
across 787 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
ADP is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage comparison queries because it hosts first-party pages like “ADP vs. Paychex” and “ADP vs. Paycor” on adp.com. The single highest-ROI fix is to improve conversion-stage crawlability for pricing and to add/verify B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) so models can cite “How much does ADP cost?” and “Is ADP worth it for a mid-sized company?” from ADP pages rather than only third parties.
Based on audit of adp.com · Jun 5, 2026