Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Meeting Tools

The meeting tools landscape consolidates around three core functions: video conferencing (Zoom, Webex, Google Meet), scheduling (Calendly, Calendar), and integrated collaboration suites (Microsoft Teams Room, Google Workspace). Zoom's 64% shortlist rate and maximum model diversity (5) signal broad AI consensus on its category leadership, while Microsoft Teams Room and Google Workspace achieve 60%+ shortlist rates with slightly lower diversity (4), suggesting strong but more contextual recommendations. The 88:12 ratio of consensus to evaluation brands indicates a mature category where AI models agree on established players rather than exploring emerging alternatives.

177 discovery queries · 241 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 177 buyer-style "Meeting Tools" queries

0%22%44%66%88%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces70%75%80%85%90%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Meeting Tools sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Miro
6/6
2Zoom
6/6
3Mural
6/6
4Turn
6/6
5Whiteboard
6/6
1Microsoft
6/6
2Zoom
6/6
3Google Meet
6/6
4Google Workspace
6/6
5Place
5/6
1Microsoft
5/5
2Miro
5/5
3Zoom
4/5
4Loom
3/5
5Google Workspace
3/5
1Zoom
5/5
2Microsoft
5/5
3Google Workspace
4/5
4Calendar
4/5
5Chorus
4/5
1Calendly
4/4
2Microsoft
4/4
3Reclaim
4/4
4Calendar
4/4
5Google Workspace
4/4
1Zoom
4/4
2Loom
4/4
3Microsoft
4/4
4Calendar
4/4
5Webex
4/4
1Zoom
4/4
2Loom
4/4
3Google Workspace
4/4
4Default
4/4
5Microsoft
4/4
1Zoom
4/4
2Default
4/4
3Microsoft
4/4
4Google Workspace
3/4
5Webex
3/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · meeting-tools

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

645 citations captured across Meeting Tools prompt runs.

Vendor pages

166

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

132

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Meeting Tools questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Meeting Tools?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Meeting Tools leaderboard →