[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Zapier
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

64

across 939 prompts

AI Share of Voice

64%

across 939 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Workflow Automation · of 203

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
687 category
Cited83%572/687
Share of voice70%avg
Engine consensus66%of engines
Competitors19.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus75%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice87%avg
Engine consensus87%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Zapier is visible in

2
  • Workflow Automation1 of 203→
  • Workflow Automation2 of 146→

Executive summary

Zapier is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party B2B review presence (e.g., TrustRadius shows 852 reviews and Gartner Peer Insights shows 188 ratings) and it publishes crawlable, tiered pricing on its own domain. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces (especially structured, brand-led comparison/alternatives pages and schema coverage for evaluation queries) so AI engines can cite Zapier directly for “Zapier vs X” and “alternatives to Zapier” without relying as much on third-party review sites.

Based on audit of zapier.com · Apr 23, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy