Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Category · AI Citation Index

Collaboration

The collaboration category exhibits remarkable consensus with 226 brands recognized but only 8 distinct leaders commanding 61-69% shortlist rates and perfect model diversity scores of 5. This uniformity suggests the market has matured into established camps (Slack, Microsoft, Google Workspace, Notion, Asana, Atlassian) where brand familiarity drives selection. The complete absence of prompt coverage indicates buyers aren't articulating specific collaboration needs in their searches—they're defaulting to known entities, suggesting either feature parity across platforms or that collaboration tool selection happens through organizational mandate rather than bottoms-up evaluation.

636 discovery queries · 905 head-to-heads · refreshed Sep 24, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 636 buyer-style "Collaboration" queries

44%51%58%66%73%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces76%79%81%84%86%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Collaboration sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Microsoft
16/16
2Slack
16/16
3Google Workspace
13/16
4Asana
12/16
5monday dev
12/16
1monday dev
14/14
2monday.com
14/14
3Asana
14/14
4ClickUp
14/14
5Jira
14/14
1Microsoft
11/11
2Notion
10/11
3Slack
9/11
4Stacks
8/11
5Asana
7/11
1monday dev
7/7
2monday.com
7/7
3Slack
7/7
4Microsoft
7/7
5Asana
6/7
1Slack
7/7
2Microsoft
7/7
3Asana
7/7
4monday dev
7/7
5monday.com
7/7
1Microsoft
6/6
2Notion
6/6
3Confluence
6/6
4Slack
5/6
5Asana
5/6
1Slack
6/6
2Microsoft
6/6
3Google Workspace
6/6
4Calendar
6/6
5Asana
6/6
1Microsoft
6/6
2Slack
6/6
3Google Workspace
5/6
4Asana
5/6
5monday dev
5/6
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · collaboration

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 3/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand020406080Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 3/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

857 citations captured across Collaboration prompt runs.

Vendor pages

194

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

207

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Collaboration questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Collaboration?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Collaboration leaderboard →