Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Whiteboarding

The whiteboarding category shows clear winner consolidation, with Miro, Mural, Figma, and Lucidchart all achieving 54-62% shortlist rates and maximum model diversity (4), indicating universal AI recognition. These tools have transcended pure whiteboarding to become comprehensive visual collaboration platforms. The steep drop to generic entries like google.com (28%) and Microsoft Whiteboard (27%) suggests that standalone whiteboard features cannot compete with integrated design and diagramming ecosystems. Niche players like useworkshop.com and getplan.co remain sub-25%, indicating limited AI awareness or applicability.

156 discovery queries · 208 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 29, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 156 buyer-style "Whiteboarding" queries

0%25%50%75%100%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%73%80%87%95%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Whiteboarding sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Miro
6/6
2Jamboard
6/6
3Figma
6/6
4Lucidchart
5/6
5Mural
5/6
1Miro
5/5
2Mural
5/5
3Figma
5/5
4Lucidchart
4/5
5POINT
3/5
1Miro
5/5
2Figma
5/5
3Mural
5/5
4Lucidchart
5/5
5Whimsical
3/5
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Mural
4/4
4Lucidchart
4/4
5Whimsical
3/4
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Lucidchart
4/4
4Mural
4/4
5Whimsical
2/4
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Mural
4/4
4Lucidchart
3/4
5Jamboard
3/4
1Miro
4/4
2Lucidchart
4/4
3Figma
4/4
4Mural
4/4
5Jamboard
3/4
1Miro
4/4
2Mural
4/4
3Figma
4/4
4Lucidchart
4/4
5Conceptboard
1/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · whiteboarding

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06131925Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

425 citations captured across Whiteboarding prompt runs.

Vendor pages

205

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

126

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Whiteboarding questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Whiteboarding?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Whiteboarding leaderboard →