Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Whiteboarding

Whiteboarding is a stalemate at the top. Miro, Mural, and Whiteboard each surface in roughly 60% of buyer queries about whiteboarding tools, all appearing across every engine we track (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini). Figma sits a step below at 59%, and Lucidchart lands at 54%. The consensus picks — Miro, Mural, Whiteboard — tie in head-to-head matchups at 44 out of 100, while Figma lags two points behind at 42. ClickUp is the absent giant: wins more head-to-heads than any brand we audit (78), yet never surfaces in AI discovery prompts. The category is consolidated but contested, with a clear top tier and no single winner.

156 discovery queries · 177 head-to-heads · refreshed Aug 16, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 156 buyer-style "Whiteboarding" queries

Miro, Mural, and Whiteboard form a three-way tie, each showing up in 61%, 61%, and 60% of buyer queries about whiteboarding tools, respectively, and each surfacing across all three AI engines we track (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini). Figma follows at 59%, and Lucidchart at 54%, both also visible on every engine. Below that tier, Flowcharts (32% of discovery prompts), Jamboard (28%), Shapes (25%), and Workshop (24%) round out the middle of the pack, all surfacing across all three engines but with weaker share of attention.

8%23%38%53%69%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces65%74%83%91%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Whiteboarding sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Miro
6/6
2Jamboard
6/6
3Figma
6/6
4Microsoft Whiteboard
6/6
5Whiteboard
6/6
1Miro
5/5
2Mural
5/5
3Microsoft Whiteboard
5/5
4Figma
5/5
5Lucidchart
4/5
1Miro
5/5
2Figma
5/5
3Mural
5/5
4Whiteboard
5/5
5Lucidchart
5/5
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Mural
4/4
4Lucidchart
4/4
5Microsoft Whiteboard
4/4
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Lucidchart
4/4
4Flowcharts
4/4
5Microsoft Whiteboard
4/4
1Miro
4/4
2Figma
4/4
3Microsoft Whiteboard
4/4
4Mural
4/4
5Whiteboard
4/4
1Miro
4/4
2Lucidchart
4/4
3Figma
4/4
4Mural
4/4
5Microsoft Whiteboard
4/4
1Miro
4/4
2Microsoft Whiteboard
4/4
3Mural
4/4
4Figma
4/4
5Lucidchart
4/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · whiteboarding

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 8/100

When buyers ask AI to compare whiteboarding tools head-to-head, Miro, Mural, and Whiteboard tie at 44 out of 100, each evaluated across two dozen matchups. Figma sits two points behind at 42 across 23 comparison queries. Shapes and Lucidchart both score 31, well below the category median of 8, meaning they lose more head-to-heads than they win. The top tier trades wins evenly; no brand breaks away in evaluation-stage prompts.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 8/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

425 citations captured across Whiteboarding prompt runs.

Vendor pages

205

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

126

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Whiteboarding questions

Buyers ask AI for whiteboarding tools filtered by team context and workflow — phrasings like 'whiteboarding solutions for product development teams', 'whiteboarding for project planning', 'best whiteboarding software for remote teams'. A smaller slice of prompts digs into feature evaluation: 'key features of whiteboarding tools', 'how to evaluate the security features of whiteboarding solutions', 'how to evaluate mobile compatibility in whiteboarding solutions'. The questions stay in the discovery and feature-comparison lanes; no pricing or trust-signal prompts show up in the current audit set.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Whiteboarding?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Whiteboarding leaderboard →