AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 332 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 332 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Guideflow is visible in
2Executive summary
Guideflow is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (140 reviews shown on the G2 profile page) and a fully public, tiered pricing page with specific monthly prices. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation queries that depend on first-party comparison content (e.g., “How does Guideflow compare to Storylane?” / “...Supademo?”): live search did not surface first-party “Guideflow vs Storylane/Supademo” pages on guideflow.com, so AI engines may rely on third-party comparisons instead of citing Guideflow directly.
Based on audit of guideflow.com · May 9, 2026