AI Visibility
measured17/100
Emerging · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 315 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 315 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Jamie is visible in
2Executive summary
meetjamie.ai is a B2B AI meeting assistant and already has meaningful third-party review visibility on G2 (22 reviews on the Jamie seller page). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while the site has first-party “alternatives”/comparison-style content, there’s no clear evidence of first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages that AI engines can reliably cite for head-to-head evaluation queries. Highest-ROI fix: create/standardize crawlable, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., /compare/jamie-vs-otter, /compare/jamie-vs-tactiq) and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on those pages and the pricing page.
Based on audit of meetjamie.ai · May 6, 2026