[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Krisp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

1

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 330 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 330 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
202 category
Cited7%14/202
Share of voice6%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors8.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Krisp is visible in

2
  • Video Conferencingnot yet measured→
  • Voice AInot yet measured→

Executive summary

Krisp.ai is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has an active G2 presence and a Gartner Peer Insights product page. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation surfaces (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and clearer “[Krisp] vs [Competitor]” pages) so AI engines can cite Krisp directly for comparison and pricing-intent prompts.

Based on audit of krisp.ai · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy