[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Miro
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

21

across 1439 prompts

AI Share of Voice

21%

across 1439 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Whiteboarding · of 26

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
955 category
Cited30%288/955
Share of voice19%avg
Engine consensus59%of engines
Competitors27.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive6+ / 0~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited100%11/11
Share of voice91%avg
Engine consensus91%of engines
Competitors2.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive8+ / 1~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus86%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive5+ / 1~ / 0−
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice95%avg
Engine consensus94%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Miro is visible in

6
  • Whiteboarding1 of 26→
  • UI/UX Design5 of 62→
  • Design7 of 111→
  • Prototyping7 of 50→
  • Collaboration15 of 150→

Executive summary

miro.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong G2 presence (4.6/5 with ~12,877 reviews and Grid leader badge) and substantial secondary review coverage (TrustRadius ~9,677 reviews; Gartner Peer Insights product page exists). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data eligibility for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure AI crawlers can reliably extract it—right now, schema presence could not be confirmed via live search.

Based on audit of miro.com · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy