The infinite collaborative whiteboard for distributed teams
Executive summary
miro.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (12,606 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party comparison pages like “Miro vs MURAL” and “Miro vs FigJam”. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data/technical AEO for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure pricing + comparison content is fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can reliably quote it for “How much does Miro cost?” and “How does Miro compare to MURAL/FigJam/Lucidspark?”.
Based on audit of miro.com · Apr 2, 2026
Avg Prompt Score
47
across 20 prompts
Category Rank
#1
of 14 brands
vs. Category Avg
+9
avg 63/100
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Design · score distribution
14 brands72/100 · #1 of 14 · +9 above avg
Pillar scores vs. category average
Vertical line = category average (14 brands)