Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Scheduling & Calendar

The scheduling category demonstrates robust organic demand with 93 consensus brands and uniformly high model diversity (all top brands=4), indicating models independently recognize these tools across different contexts rather than following prompt patterns. Shortlist rates spanning 25-60% reveal a tiered market where established players (Calendar, Built, Calendly) achieve strong consideration while niche solutions maintain meaningful presence. The absence of prompt coverage yet strong performance suggests scheduling needs emerge naturally from workflow discussions rather than explicit user requests.

174 discovery queries · 302 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 174 buyer-style "Scheduling & Calendar" queries

0%12%24%36%48%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces69%75%81%87%93%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Scheduling & Calendar sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Built
6/6
2Cvent
5/6
3Agenda
5/6
4Plan
5/6
5Paid
5/6
1Wrike
5/6
2Built
5/6
3Calendar
5/6
4Microsoft
4/6
5Plan
4/6
1Calendar
5/5
2Built
5/5
3Calendly
3/5
4TickTick
2/5
5Google Workspace
1/5
1Calendar
5/5
2Google Workspace
5/5
3Calendly
5/5
4Robin
5/5
5Reclaim
5/5
1Calendar
4/4
2Built
4/4
3Calendly
3/4
4Google Workspace
3/4
5Microsoft
3/4
1Dubsado
4/4
2Calendly
4/4
3Built
3/4
4Calendar
3/4
5Google Workspace
3/4
1Calendar
4/4
2Built
4/4
3Google Workspace
4/4
4Calendly
2/4
5Wrike
2/4
1NEXT
4/4
2Calendly
4/4
3Calendar
4/4
4Cal.com
3/4
5YouCanBookMe
3/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · scheduling

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08162432Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

672 citations captured across Scheduling & Calendar prompt runs.

Vendor pages

146

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

157

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Scheduling & Calendar questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Scheduling & Calendar?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Scheduling & Calendar leaderboard →