AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals19/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
46
across 1091 prompts
AI Share of Voice
46%
across 1091 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
33/78
Challenger · Collaboration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Calendar is visible in
4Your visibility gap
Calendar surfaces in 33/78 Collaboration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 45 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
calendar.com has meaningful B2B AI citation signals (G2: 77 reviews, 4.7/5; Gartner Peer Insights: 4.6 with 60 ratings; TrustRadius: 21 reviews), and its pricing page is publicly crawlable with explicit tiers. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage for enterprise/startup sizing and “what is/how does it work” collaboration explanations—there are no clearly discoverable first-party comparison pages and no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on the site, which limits eligibility for evaluation queries.
Based on audit of calendar.com · May 8, 2026