[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sched
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

16

across 174 prompts

AI Share of Voice

16%

across 174 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

4/80

Not Visible · Scheduling Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
92 category
Cited20%18/92
Share of voice16%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors6.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sched is visible in

1
  • Scheduling & Calendarnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Sched surfaces in 4/80 Scheduling discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Sched →

Executive summary

Sched.com is already cited for scheduling/agenda use cases (Claude cites it for virtual workshops and recurring/community event planning), and it has meaningful B2B review authority on G2 (25 reviews) plus a Gartner Peer Insights profile (5.0 rating). The biggest AI citation blocker is missing first-party evaluation content that answers conflict-avoidance, real-time availability, time-zone coordination, and interview scheduling queries—so AI can’t reliably cite Sched for those high-intent gaps.

Based on audit of sched.com · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy