AI Visibility
measured27/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
17
across 174 prompts
AI Share of Voice
17%
across 174 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
4/80
Not Visible · Scheduling Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sched is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Sched surfaces in 4/80 Scheduling discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Sched.com is already cited for scheduling/agenda use cases (Claude cites it for virtual workshops and recurring/community event planning), and it has meaningful B2B review authority on G2 (25 reviews) plus a Gartner Peer Insights profile (5.0 rating). The biggest AI citation blocker is missing first-party evaluation content that answers conflict-avoidance, real-time availability, time-zone coordination, and interview scheduling queries—so AI can’t reliably cite Sched for those high-intent gaps.
Based on audit of sched.com · Jun 5, 2026