AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 156 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 156 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Better Impact is a B2B volunteer management SaaS with strong AI-citation signals from G2 (4.7/5 with ~141 reviews for “Better Impact” and ~140 reviews for “Volunteer Impact by Better Impact”). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “pricing” and “SoftwareApplication/structured evaluation” surfaces: the site has plan tiers but pricing is not clearly crawlable as a structured, machine-readable offer, and there’s no evidence of SoftwareApplication/aggregateRating schema on key pages.
Based on audit of betterimpact.com · Jun 8, 2026