AI Visibility
measured62/100
Frequently Cited · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals78/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
54
across 1015 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 1015 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
1/265
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Calendly is visible in
5Executive summary
Calendly is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for scheduling/meeting software queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 and TrustRadius) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit seat-based tiers. The biggest remaining citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” coverage on Calendly’s own site (first-party comparison/FAQ surfaces), which can limit how often AI cites Calendly directly for shortlist comparisons.
Based on audit of calendly.com · Oct 11, 2026