[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Calendly
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

78

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

57

across 1068 prompts

AI Share of Voice

57%

across 1068 prompts

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
674 category
Cited74%502/674
Share of voice69%avg
Engine consensus64%of engines
Competitors6.8avg/cited
Sentimentpositive8+ / 1~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited100%13/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus85%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentimentpositive9+ / 3~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice89%avg
Engine consensus89%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Calendly is visible in

5
  • Scheduling & Calendar2 of 43→
  • Meeting Tools9 of 82→
  • Applicant Trackingnot yet measured→
  • Revenue Operationsnot yet measured→
  • Sales Engagementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Calendly is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 2,619+ G2 reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit per-seat tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen/verify B2B structured data for AI evaluation (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + pricing/offer markup) so models can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / how much it costs / how it compares” from first-party pages.

Based on audit of calendly.com · May 21, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy