AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
54
across 1014 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 1014 prompts
Critical Issues
1
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Calendly is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority (notably G2) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-seat pricing. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand structured Q&A coverage (FAQPage + SoftwareApplication/Organization schema consistency) so AI engines can directly answer evaluation prompts like “Calendly vs X” and “Calendly pricing” from first-party content.
Based on audit of calendly.com · Aug 26, 2026