AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 345 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 345 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Cirrus Insight is visible in
2Executive summary
Cirrus Insight is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,510 reviews, 4.2/5) and first-party comparison pages like “Cirrus Insight vs. Yesware” and “Cirrus Insight vs. Revenue Grid.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-specific structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting evaluation/pricing questions) and ensure it’s crawlable/SSR so AI engines can confidently answer “How much does Cirrus Insight cost?” and “Is Cirrus Insight worth it for mid-market sales teams?” from first-party sources.
Based on audit of cirrusinsight.com · Jun 2, 2026