[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Connecteam
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

23

across 797 prompts

AI Share of Voice

21%

across 776 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
504 category
Cited25%126/504
Share of voice24%avg
Engine consensus41%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited92%12/13
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice78%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Connecteam is visible in

3
  • Collaboration109 of 156→
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→
  • Team Messagingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Connecteam is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best workforce management software?" and all "How does Connecteam compare to When I Work/Homebase/Deputy/Sling/7shifts?" because it has strong G2 authority (3,498 reviews, 4.6/5) and first-party comparison pages plus a publicly crawlable pricing page. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure technical crawlability signals (robots/llms.txt) are explicitly aligned for AI crawlers, so AI engines can reliably extract product/pricing facts and comparison answers.

Based on audit of connecteam.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy