[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Connecteam
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

22

across 784 prompts

AI Share of Voice

22%

across 784 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
506 category
Cited25%128/506
Share of voice24%avg
Engine consensus52%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentimentpositive5+ / 1~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.3avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 15~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Connecteam is visible in

3
  • Collaboration182 of 333→
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→
  • Team Messagingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Connecteam is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a large, high-rated G2 presence (3,505 reviews, 4.6★, Grid Leader) and first-party comparison pages like “Connecteam vs. Deputy” and “Connecteam vs. Homebase.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B SoftwareApplication + pricing/FAQ structured data on key product/pricing pages so AI engines can reliably extract “How much does Connecteam cost?” and “How does Connecteam compare to X?” directly from connecteam.com.

Based on audit of connecteam.com · Jul 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy