AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Live Chat
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 305 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 285 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Live Chat
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Rocket Chat is visible in
2Executive summary
Rocket.Chat is highly likely to be cited for “best business instant messaging software” and “Rocket.Chat vs Microsoft Teams/Slack” because it has strong G2 presence (359 reviews, 4.2★) and active first-party evaluation content (security + alternatives). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages and evaluation-structured content (FAQPage + SoftwareApplication schema) so AI engines can cite Rocket.Chat directly for “how does Rocket.Chat compare…” and “how much does Rocket.Chat cost?” without relying on third parties.
Based on audit of rocket.chat · Apr 1, 2026