[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Rocket Chat
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 305 prompts

AI Share of Voice

0%

across 285 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
165 brand-level
Cited1%1/165
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors25.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited77%10/13
Share of voice77%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited60%3/5
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited43%3/7
Share of voice43%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Rocket Chat is visible in

2
  • Live Chat68 of 82→
  • Team Messagingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Rocket.Chat is highly likely to be cited for “best business instant messaging software” and “Rocket.Chat vs Microsoft Teams/Slack” because it has strong G2 presence (359 reviews, 4.2★) and active first-party evaluation content (security + alternatives). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages and evaluation-structured content (FAQPage + SoftwareApplication schema) so AI engines can cite Rocket.Chat directly for “how does Rocket.Chat compare…” and “how much does Rocket.Chat cost?” without relying on third parties.

Based on audit of rocket.chat · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy