[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Workable
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

85

across 663 prompts

AI Share of Voice

86%

across 641 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in Applicant Tracking · of 82

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
468 category
Cited93%437/468
Share of voice88%avg
Engine consensus61%of engines
Competitors4.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
16 brand-level
Cited81%13/16
Share of voice79%avg
Engine consensus89%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited25%1/4
Share of voice25%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Workable is visible in

1
  • Applicant Tracking5 of 82→

Executive summary

Workable is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party authority (notably 686 G2 reviews at 4.5★ per your pre-verified context) and it publishes first-party comparison pages like “Workable vs Greenhouse” and “Workable vs Lever.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure pricing + key evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR with schema, so prompts like “How much does Workable cost?” and “How does Workable compare to Greenhouse?” can be answered directly from workable.com rather than only from third parties.

Based on audit of workable.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy