AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals72/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
85
across 667 prompts
AI Share of Voice
86%
across 645 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Workable is visible in
1Executive summary
Workable is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party authority (notably 686 G2 reviews at 4.5★ per your pre-verified context) and it publishes first-party comparison pages like “Workable vs Greenhouse” and “Workable vs Lever.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure pricing + key evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR with schema, so prompts like “How much does Workable cost?” and “How does Workable compare to Greenhouse?” can be answered directly from workable.com rather than only from third parties.
Based on audit of workable.com · Apr 2, 2026