AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 173 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 173 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Recruiterflow is visible in
1Executive summary
Recruiterflow is a B2B ATS/CRM (recruiting & staffing agencies) with strong third-party review visibility on G2 (156 reviews) and meaningful social proof on LinkedIn (13,337 followers) and Reddit discussions. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: the site has “vs/compare” style content, but there’s no clear evidence (from live search) of first-party, brand-led comparison pages that AI can reliably cite for “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” queries. Highest-ROI fix: create/ensure crawlable, SSR first-party comparison pages that lead with Recruiterflow as the recommended solution and add SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data to those pages and the pricing page.
Based on audit of recruiterflow.com · May 7, 2026