[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Greenhouse
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

81

across 568 prompts

AI Share of Voice

84%

across 547 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Applicant Tracking · of 53

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
359 category
Cited99%355/359
Share of voice91%avg
Engine consensus76%of engines
Competitors12.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited13%2/15
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Greenhouse is visible in

2
  • AI Recruiting1 of 53→
  • Applicant Tracking1 of 53→

Executive summary

Greenhouse is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (3798 reviews, 4.4★) and an active B2B review ecosystem (Capterra + TrustRadius pages exist). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/uncrawlable first-party evaluation assets—especially first-party comparison pages for queries like "How does Greenhouse compare to Lever?" and "How does Greenhouse compare to Workday Recruiting?"—plus lack of evidence of crawlable, tiered pricing on greenhouse.io.

Based on audit of greenhouse.io · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy