AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
81
across 561 prompts
AI Share of Voice
84%
across 540 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Greenhouse is visible in
2Executive summary
Greenhouse is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (3798 reviews, 4.4★) and an active B2B review ecosystem (Capterra + TrustRadius pages exist). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/uncrawlable first-party evaluation assets—especially first-party comparison pages for queries like "How does Greenhouse compare to Lever?" and "How does Greenhouse compare to Workday Recruiting?"—plus lack of evidence of crawlable, tiered pricing on greenhouse.io.
Based on audit of greenhouse.io · Apr 2, 2026