[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/iCIMS
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

84

Authoritative Source

Avg Prompt Score

85

across 282 prompts

AI Share of Voice

85%

across 282 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in AI Recruiting · of 53

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

21/25

Leader · Ai Recruiting Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
176 category
Cited98%172/176
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus51%of engines
Competitors4.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories iCIMS is visible in

1
  • AI Recruiting2 of 53→

Your visibility gap

iCIMS surfaces in 21/25 Ai Recruiting discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 4 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim iCIMS →

Executive summary

iCIMS has strong AI citation foundations for AI recruiting discovery queries (G2 shows 991 reviews and a 4.2/5 rating). The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage “labor market / talent intelligence” questions (supply-demand, skills mapping, internal mobility, compensation benchmarking) because iCIMS lacks clearly crawlable first-party pages that directly answer those specific buyer prompts.

Based on audit of icims.com · May 19, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy