Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Proposal & CPQ

The Proposal & CPQ category shows mature vendor competition with shortlist rates clustering between 38-66%, indicating buyers find multiple viable options rather than a single dominant solution. PandaDoc's 66% shortlist rate and maximum model diversity suggest it addresses the broadest range of use cases, while HubSpot's 62% rate likely reflects its embedded CRM advantage. The presence of both specialized players (Qwilr, DealHub) and enterprise suite components (Salesforce, Oracle, Conga) at similar performance levels reveals a market serving distinct buyer segments—from SMBs seeking standalone document automation to enterprises requiring integrated quote-to-cash workflows.

170 discovery queries · 329 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 170 buyer-style "Proposal & CPQ" queries

26%37%49%60%71%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces74%81%87%94%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Proposal & CPQ sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Salesforce
7/7
2DealHub
7/7
3Hubspot
7/7
4PandaDoc
7/7
5Proposify
6/7
1Hubspot
6/6
2PandaDoc
6/6
3Qwilr
6/6
4Proposify
6/6
5Salesforce
5/6
1PandaDoc
5/6
2Hubspot
5/6
3Netsuite
5/6
4Conga
5/6
5Adobe
5/6
1DealHub
5/5
2Salesforce
5/5
3PandaDoc
4/5
4Proposify
4/5
5Hubspot
4/5
1PandaDoc
5/5
2Proposify
5/5
3Better Proposals
5/5
4Qwilr
5/5
5Hubspot
4/5
1PandaDoc
4/4
2Hubspot
4/4
3Oracle
4/4
4Salesforce
3/4
5DealHub
3/4
1PandaDoc
4/4
2Proposify
4/4
3Qwilr
3/4
4Hubspot
3/4
5Better Proposals
2/4
1Hubspot
4/4
2Proposify
4/4
3PandaDoc
4/4
4Qwilr
4/4
5Salesforce
4/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · proposal-cpq

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 15/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07152229Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 15/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

480 citations captured across Proposal & CPQ prompt runs.

Vendor pages

221

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

120

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Proposal & CPQ questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Proposal & CPQ?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Proposal & CPQ leaderboard →