Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Proposal & CPQ

The Proposal & CPQ category shows strong vendor consolidation around document-centric platforms. PandaDoc (66% shortlist rate) and Salesforce (65%) dominate with consistent performance across five distinct buyer models each, suggesting broad applicability from SMB to enterprise. Mid-tier players like Built (58%), Qwilr (55%), and Conga Grid (54%) maintain solid positioning, while SAP CPQ's lower 31% rate despite maximum diversity hints at niche enterprise focus. The 51-brand consensus pool against only 12 evaluation brands indicates many vendors receive consideration but few undergo rigorous vetting.

170 discovery queries · 331 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 170 buyer-style "Proposal & CPQ" queries

1%24%46%68%90%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%74%83%91%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Proposal & CPQ sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Salesforce
7/7
2PandaDoc
7/7
3Conga
6/7
4Proposify
6/7
5Qwilr
6/7
1Salesforce
6/6
2PandaDoc
6/6
3Qwilr
6/6
4Proposify
6/6
5Built
5/6
1Built
6/6
2Salesforce
5/6
3Conga
5/6
4PandaDoc
5/6
5Netsuite
5/6
1Built
5/5
2Salesforce
5/5
3PandaDoc
4/5
4Proposify
4/5
5Qwilr
4/5
1PandaDoc
5/5
2Proposify
5/5
3Better Proposals
5/5
4Qwilr
5/5
5Salesforce
4/5
1PandaDoc
4/4
2Salesforce
4/4
3Built
3/4
4Conga
3/4
5Netsuite
3/4
1Built
4/4
2PandaDoc
4/4
3Proposify
4/4
4Qwilr
3/4
5Salesforce
3/4
1Salesforce
4/4
2Built
4/4
3Proposify
4/4
4PandaDoc
4/4
5Qwilr
4/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · proposal-cpq

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 14/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07152229Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 14/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

480 citations captured across Proposal & CPQ prompt runs.

Vendor pages

221

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

120

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Proposal & CPQ questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Proposal & CPQ?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Proposal & CPQ leaderboard →