[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Proposify
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

79

across 318 prompts

AI Share of Voice

80%

across 295 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Proposal & CPQ · of 97

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
204 category
Cited92%187/204
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors12.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited93%14/15
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Proposify is visible in

1
  • Proposal & CPQ4 of 97→

Executive summary

Proposify is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 visibility (1,135 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party competitor comparison pages like “Proposify vs Qwilr” and “Proposify vs PandaDoc.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B evaluation structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting the exact evaluation prompts) and ensure it’s discoverable to AI crawlers, since schema signals were not found in live checks while pricing and comparisons are already crawlable.

Based on audit of proposify.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy