AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals59/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 599 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 599 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Scribbl is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 review volume (710+ reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers (e.g., $13/$20/user/month and a Team plan). The biggest citation risk is missing/unclear secondary review + enterprise analyst signals (Capterra/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights/IDC/Forrester) and likely incomplete structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) on first-party pages.
Based on audit of scribbl.co · Jul 14, 2026