AI Visibility
measured49/100
Frequently Cited · in Proposal & CPQ
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 114 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 90 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Proposal & CPQ
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Conga Grid is visible in
1Executive summary
Conga is strongly positioned for AI citation on CPQ evaluation queries because it has substantial G2 presence (2,083+ reviews on G2) and enterprise validation via Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice (2024 and 2025 press signals). The highest-risk pattern is pricing and evaluation-stage comparison citation: the public pricing page is non-specific (“customized pricing” / “Get Conga pricing”) and first-party competitor comparison coverage appears to be blog/FAQ-style rather than dedicated, crawlable “[Conga] vs Salesforce CPQ / Oracle CPQ / SAP CPQ” pages.
Based on audit of conga.com · Apr 1, 2026