[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Conga Grid
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

13

across 114 prompts

AI Share of Voice

4%

across 90 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
86 brand-level
Cited0%0/86
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited83%10/12
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited88%7/8
Share of voice88%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited38%3/8
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Conga Grid is visible in

1
  • Proposal & CPQnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Conga is strongly positioned for AI citation on CPQ evaluation queries because it has substantial G2 presence (2,083+ reviews on G2) and enterprise validation via Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice (2024 and 2025 press signals). The highest-risk pattern is pricing and evaluation-stage comparison citation: the public pricing page is non-specific (“customized pricing” / “Get Conga pricing”) and first-party competitor comparison coverage appears to be blog/FAQ-style rather than dedicated, crawlable “[Conga] vs Salesforce CPQ / Oracle CPQ / SAP CPQ” pages.

Based on audit of conga.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy