[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/PandaDoc
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

40

across 1354 prompts

AI Share of Voice

40%

across 1329 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Proposal & CPQ · of 43

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
832 category
Cited48%402/832
Share of voice44%avg
Engine consensus70%of engines
Competitors11.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
16 brand-level
Cited75%12/16
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories PandaDoc is visible in

6
  • Proposal & CPQ1 of 43→
  • eSignature4 of 52→
  • Contract Lifecycle Management7 of 60→
  • Office & Productivity59 of 183→
  • Digital Asset Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

PandaDoc is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (3,391+ reviews shown on G2) and first-party competitor comparison pages like “PandaDoc vs DocuSign” and “PandaDoc vs Qwilr.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data + crawlability for evaluation pages (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage) so AI engines can reliably extract “best proposal software” and “PandaDoc vs DocuSign/Dropbox Sign/Proposify/Qwilr/Adobe Acrobat Sign” answers from pandadoc.com itself.

Based on audit of pandadoc.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy