AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in Proposal & CPQ
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
41
across 1364 prompts
AI Share of Voice
41%
across 1339 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Proposal & CPQ
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories PandaDoc is visible in
6Executive summary
PandaDoc is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (3,391+ reviews shown on G2) and first-party competitor comparison pages like “PandaDoc vs DocuSign” and “PandaDoc vs Qwilr.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data + crawlability for evaluation pages (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage) so AI engines can reliably extract “best proposal software” and “PandaDoc vs DocuSign/Dropbox Sign/Proposify/Qwilr/Adobe Acrobat Sign” answers from pandadoc.com itself.
Based on audit of pandadoc.com · Apr 1, 2026