[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/GetAccept
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

4

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 459 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 459 prompts

Category Visibility

#22

in Proposal & CPQ · of 42

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
216 category
Cited12%25/216
Share of voice8%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors14.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories GetAccept is visible in

4
  • eSignature21 of 51→
  • Proposal & CPQ24 of 42→
  • Contract Lifecycle Managementnot yet measured→
  • Sales Engagementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

GetAccept is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 1,227+ G2 reviews) and clear first-party pricing/feature comparison surfaces (e.g., /pricing and /pricing/compare). The highest-risk citation pattern is conversion-stage “GetAccept pricing” and evaluation “GetAccept vs competitor” queries if AI cannot reliably extract structured pricing and SoftwareApplication/FAQPage evaluation schema from crawlable pages; the single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + Product/Offer) on pricing and evaluation pages and ensure those pages are SSR-crawlable.

Based on audit of getaccept.com · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy