AI Visibility
measured74/100
Frequently Cited · in Prototyping
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
64
across 1239 prompts
AI Share of Voice
64%
across 1239 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Prototyping
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Figma is visible in
5Executive summary
Figma is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 2,057+ G2 reviews) and active integration/ecosystem content. The single highest-ROI fix is to improve Technical AEO for AI crawlers: Figma’s robots.txt appears to disallow GPTBot/Claude/Perplexity/Anthropic AI bots, which can prevent AI engines from citing key first-party pages (pricing, comparisons, structured Q&A).
Based on audit of figma.com · Oct 11, 2026