AI Visibility
measured81/100
Frequently Cited · in Prototyping
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
64
across 1236 prompts
AI Share of Voice
64%
across 1236 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Prototyping
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Figma is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 + Capterra + TrustRadius + Gartner Peer Insights) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and explicit evaluation-oriented pages) so AI can cite figma.com directly for “vs/alternatives/pricing” rather than relying primarily on review sites.
Based on audit of figma.com · Aug 24, 2026