[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Runn
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

38

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

46

across 195 prompts

AI Share of Voice

46%

across 195 prompts

Category Visibility

#14

in Resource Planning · of 135

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
119 category
Cited51%61/119
Share of voice36%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors22.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Runn is visible in

1
  • Resource Planning14 of 135→

Executive summary

Runn is a B2B resource management/capacity planning SaaS with strong first-party pricing and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Runn vs Float, Runn vs Kantata). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage for “best resource management software” and “alternatives to Runn” where AI engines typically rely on richer third-party review volume and structured product schema—currently likely thin on SoftwareApplication/FAQPage and limited by only 1 G2 review.

Based on audit of runn.io · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy