AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in Resource Planning
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals38/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
55
across 212 prompts
AI Share of Voice
55%
across 212 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Resource Planning
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Runn is a B2B resource management/capacity planning SaaS with strong first-party pricing and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Runn vs Float, Runn vs Kantata). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage for “best resource management software” and “alternatives to Runn” where AI engines typically rely on richer third-party review volume and structured product schema—currently likely thin on SoftwareApplication/FAQPage and limited by only 1 G2 review.
Based on audit of runn.io · Jun 5, 2026