Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

AI Search

The AI search category reveals a stark divide between enterprise adoption patterns and consumer narratives. Traditional search infrastructure providers (Elastic, Algolia, Glean) command the highest shortlist rates, suggesting organizations prioritize integrating AI capabilities into existing search workflows over replacing them with standalone answer-engines. Perplexity's 30% shortlist rate—respectable but half of Elastic's—indicates that conversational search remains complementary rather than substitutional for most buyers. The 4-way tie in model_diversity across top brands suggests evaluators test AI search solutions against consistent criteria regardless of architectural approach.

90 discovery queries · 223 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 90 buyer-style "AI Search" queries

4%22%40%58%76%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces48%59%71%82%93%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for AI Search sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Weaviate
4/5
2Elastic
4/5
3Glean
4/5
4Algolia
3/5
5Microsoft
3/5
1Glean
5/5
2Elastic
5/5
3Microsoft
4/5
4GoSearch
3/5
5Moveworks
3/5
1Algolia
5/5
2Constructor
5/5
3Bloomreach
5/5
4Doofinder
3/5
5Elastic
3/5
1Algolia
5/5
2Elastic
4/5
3Milvus
1/5
4Tavily
1/5
5Brave
1/5
1Glean
5/5
2Microsoft
5/5
3Elastic
3/5
4Perplexity
3/5
5Squirro
2/5
1Elastic
5/5
2Algolia
3/5
3Lucidworks
3/5
4Elastic Stack
3/5
5Bloomreach
2/5
1Elastic
5/5
2Algolia
5/5
3Lucidworks
5/5
4Constructor
4/5
5Perplexity
3/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · ai-search

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 2/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08162432Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 2/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across AI Search prompt runs.

Vendor pages

310

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

160

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top AI Search questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for AI Search?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full AI Search leaderboard →