Subcategory · AI Citation Index

AI Search

The AI search category reveals a stark divide between established enterprise search infrastructure providers and emerging conversational answer-engines. Traditional players like Elastic, Algolia, and Glean command the highest shortlist rates (52-68%), suggesting buyers prioritize proven search capabilities enhanced with AI over pure conversational interfaces. Microsoft's 43% shortlist rate reflects its dual positioning through Azure Cognitive Search and Bing integration. The category's 22 consensus brands against only 12 evaluation brands indicates mature vendor awareness but selective evaluation criteria, with buyers gravitating toward platforms offering hybrid search, vector databases, and RAG capabilities rather than standalone answer-engines.

90 discovery queries · 221 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 90 buyer-style "AI Search" queries

0%7%14%20%27%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces47%60%73%87%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for AI Search sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Weaviate
4/5
2Elastic
4/5
3Glean
4/5
4Algolia
3/5
5Microsoft
3/5
1Glean
5/5
2Elastic
5/5
3Microsoft
4/5
4Moveworks
3/5
5Searchable
2/5
1Algolia
5/5
2Constructor
5/5
3Bloomreach
5/5
4Doofinder
3/5
5Elastic
3/5
1Algolia
5/5
2Elastic
4/5
3Capacity
2/5
4Searchable
2/5
5Milvus
1/5
1Glean
5/5
2Microsoft
5/5
3Elastic
3/5
4Perplexity
3/5
5Squirro
2/5
1Elastic
5/5
2Algolia
3/5
3Lucidworks
3/5
4Elastic Stack
3/5
5Bloomreach
2/5
1Elastic
5/5
2Algolia
5/5
3Constructor
4/5
4Lucidworks
4/5
5Perplexity
3/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · ai-search

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08162432Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across AI Search prompt runs.

Vendor pages

310

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

160

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top AI Search questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for AI Search?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full AI Search leaderboard →