[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Forethought
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

15

across 646 prompts

AI Share of Voice

14%

across 623 prompts

Category Visibility

#43

in AI Chatbots · of 68

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
418 category
Cited19%81/418
Share of voice18%avg
Engine consensus41%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
17 brand-level
Cited76%13/17
Share of voice73%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors0.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice56%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Forethought is visible in

2
  • Customer Service & Support39 of 115→
  • AI Chatbots43 of 68→

Executive summary

Forethought is strongly positioned for AI citation via its B2B review authority (G2: 165 reviews, 4.3★) and it has a publicly crawlable pricing page plus at least one first-party comparison surface (“Forethought vs Alternatives”). The highest-risk query pattern is the competitor-specific evaluation set (e.g., “How does Forethought compare to Ada?” / “...Zendesk for Customer Service?”), because live search did not reveal first-party, competitor-named pages for those exact rivals—so AI engines may cite third parties instead of Forethought for those prompts.

Based on audit of forethought.ai · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy