AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in AI Chatbots
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 577 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 554 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Chatbots
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Forethought is visible in
2Executive summary
Forethought is strongly positioned for AI citation via its B2B review authority (G2: 165 reviews, 4.3★) and it has a publicly crawlable pricing page plus at least one first-party comparison surface (“Forethought vs Alternatives”). The highest-risk query pattern is the competitor-specific evaluation set (e.g., “How does Forethought compare to Ada?” / “...Zendesk for Customer Service?”), because live search did not reveal first-party, competitor-named pages for those exact rivals—so AI engines may cite third parties instead of Forethought for those prompts.
Based on audit of forethought.ai · Apr 2, 2026