[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Intercom
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

78

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

16

across 2163 prompts

AI Share of Voice

16%

across 2163 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Live Chat · of 48

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Brand Accuracy

2/338

citations with inaccuracies

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1364 category
Cited18%247/1364
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus57%of engines
Competitors24.5avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 0~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive7+ / 11~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 9~ / 0−
💰Conversion
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 6~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Intercom is visible in

10
  • AI Agents1 of 96→
  • AI Customer Support Agents1 of 35→
  • Live Chat1 of 48→
  • AI Chatbots2 of 68→
  • Customer Experience2 of 186→

Executive summary

Intercom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 seller page shows 3,845 reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen/verify structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure AI-crawler crawlability of the most important evaluation pages (pricing, comparisons, and key product pages).

Based on audit of intercom.com · May 18, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy