[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Usepylon
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

69

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

69

across 8 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
no prompts at this stage
—
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors4.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Pylon is already highly citable for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong G2 presence (77 reviews, 4.7★) and publicly accessible pricing with explicit tiers (e.g., $59/$89/$139 per seat/mo). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potential crawlability gaps for AI-specific discovery signals (llms.txt/robots.txt verification), which can reduce eligibility for “best customer support software” and “alternatives” shortlists.

Based on audit of usepylon.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy