AEO Score
58
Growing Presence
Avg Prompt Score
51
across 438 prompts
AI Share of Voice
51%
across 416 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Glean is highly likely to be cited for category shortlists because it has strong G2 presence (143 reviews, 4.7★) and active enterprise customer-story pages with measurable outcomes. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and pricing: first-party “[Glean] vs Guru/Notion/Coveo/Kore.AI” pages and crawlable tiered pricing appear missing or not discoverable, which blocks direct-answer eligibility for prompts like “How does Glean compare to Guru?” and “How much does Glean cost?”. Highest-ROI fix: publish/ensure indexable first-party comparison pages for each competitor and a publicly crawlable pricing page (tiers/prices) so AI engines can cite Glean directly for evaluation queries.
Based on audit of glean.com · Apr 2, 2026