[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Yuma AI
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

3

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

20

across 98 prompts

AI Share of Voice

20%

across 98 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
29 category
Cited14%4/29
Share of voice14%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Yuma AI is visible in

1
  • AI Customer Support Agentsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Yuma.ai has strong AI-citation inputs for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (4.8/5 from 17 reviews) and clear first-party use-case coverage for e-commerce CX automation. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries like “Yuma pricing” and “Yuma vs Zendesk/Gorgias” because the pricing page is a demo-request form (no public tiers) and first-party comparison pages appear to be competitor-led (e.g., “Yuma AI vs Gorgias AI” framing).

Based on audit of yuma.ai · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy