Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Category · AI Citation Index

Design

The design tools category shows strong consolidation around established platforms, with Adobe and Figma achieving 69-71% shortlist rates and maximum model diversity (4), indicating universal AI model awareness. Canva follows at 56%, demonstrating the viability of accessibility-focused design tools. The presence of 208 consensus brands against only 12 evaluation brands (6% ratio) suggests AIs converge strongly on proven solutions, yet ins-pi.com's 54% shortlist rate signals emerging alternatives can gain traction through differentiation.

681 discovery queries · 600 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 681 buyer-style "Design" queries

9%26%44%61%79%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces70%77%84%91%98%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Design sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Adobe
39/41
2Figma
33/41
3Designer
27/41
4Canva
24/41
5Sketch
14/41
1Adobe
31/34
2Figma
30/34
3Designer
29/34
4Canva
25/34
5Miro
17/34
1Adobe
18/21
2Designer
17/21
3Canva
16/21
4Figma
15/21
5Miro
12/21
1Adobe
17/20
2Figma
16/20
3Designer
11/20
4Sketch
11/20
5Framer
9/20
1Adobe
16/16
2Figma
16/16
3Miro
12/16
4Sketch
12/16
5Frame.io
11/16
1Figma
12/12
2Adobe
12/12
3Canva
9/12
4Designer
8/12
5Sketch
5/12
1Figma
10/10
2Adobe
10/10
3Canva
10/10
4Designer
9/10
5Miro
8/10
1Figma
10/10
2Adobe
10/10
3Miro
9/10
4Canva
8/10
5Sketch
8/10
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · design

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 3/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand020395978Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 3/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

997 citations captured across Design prompt runs.

Vendor pages

187

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

204

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Design questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Design?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Design leaderboard →