AEO Audit is a free tool that scores B2B SaaS websites for AI search visibility — how likely they are to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews when B2B buyers search.

What is AI Engine Optimization (AEO)?

AI Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring content, entity signals, and technical infrastructure so that AI engines cite your brand in generated answers. It extends traditional SEO to cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.

Yes. AEO Audit is free. Enter any B2B SaaS brand and receive a full AI visibility score with prioritised recommendations.

How does AEO Audit score websites?

AEO Audit scores across six pillars: AI Visibility (22%), Brand Authority (23%), Content Quality (18%), Platform Optimization (15%), Structured Data (12%), and Technical AEO (10%). Each pillar reflects specific signals that AI engines use when deciding which sources to cite.

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Who AI is citing in Graphic Design

Adobe Substance 3D Painter leads with a 72 citation score, but no brand dominates shortlists in the 16 prompts audited.

Brands tracked

Avg AEO score

55/100

Citation coverage

of brands cited at least once

Dominant brands

cited > 50% of queries

Discovery stage

The shortlist

When buyers ask AI for the best Graphic Design software

No discovery-stage prompts have been scored against this category yet — once the shortlist cron runs, this section will surface which brands AI cites most.

Evaluation stage

The battleground

How brands fare on comparison queries · category median 61/100

Adobe Substance 3D Painter scores 61 on average across 4 comparison queries, the only brand with evaluation data. The median evaluation score sits at 61, though the single-brand sample makes competitive context impossible to derive. Business Adobe scores 58 in general citation presence, suggesting Adobe's broader suite gets mentioned but rarely in head-to-head evaluations.

Adobe Substance 3D Painter

61· 4 queries

Each brand's evaluation score averages how AI responds to head-to-head comparison queries that mention them. Above-median brands win their comparisons more often than they lose.

Trends

Over the last 12 months

Two months of trend data show a March spike to 74 average score (1 audit) dropping to 60 in April (6 audits). Sample size is too small to establish a directional trend. No rising or falling brands flagged.

Editorial picks

Brands worth watching

Adobe Substance 3D Painter

The only brand with evaluation-stage data, averaging 61 across 4 comparison queries and peaking at 72 in general citation. Adobe's 3D texturing tool punches above the category baseline of 55.

Read brand profile →

Canva

Appears in featured candidates but carries no citation score in the dataset. Its absence from shortlists and evaluation queries is notable given its consumer market dominance.

Read brand profile →

BioRender

A scientific illustration niche player with no citation score. Its presence in a general graphic design audit suggests AI models recognize specialized sub-verticals but do not yet rank them.

Read brand profile →

AWS IoT

Scores 34, the lowest among measured brands. Its appearance in a graphic design category is a data artifact or model confusion, flagging taxonomy bleed in AI citation logic.

Read brand profile →

FAQ

Graphic Design questions, answered

What is the best graphic design software according to AI models?+

No single brand dominates shortlists in the 16 prompts audited. Adobe Substance 3D Painter leads measurable citations with a 72 score, but zero shortlist coverage across the category means AI models either scatter recommendations or favor tools outside the 35 tracked brands.

How does Adobe Substance 3D Painter compare to other graphic design tools?+

Adobe Substance 3D Painter averages 61 across 4 comparison queries, the median for the category. It is the only brand with evaluation-stage data, making competitive benchmarking impossible from this dataset.

Why does Canva not appear in AI citation scores for graphic design?+

Canva is listed among featured candidates but has no citation score in the dataset. Despite massive consumer adoption, it appears in zero shortlist or evaluation queries audited, suggesting AI models may categorize it outside traditional graphic design or favor desktop-native tools in technical prompts.

Are there trends in AI citation for graphic design software?+

Two months of data show average scores dropping from 74 in March to 60 in April, but sample sizes are too small to confirm a trend. No brands are flagged as rising or falling.

What is the average AI citation score for graphic design tools?+

The category average is 55 across 35 brands. Adobe Substance 3D Painter scores 72, the highest measured. AWS IoT scores 34, likely a taxonomy error given its IoT focus.

Which graphic design brands get cited in AI model comparisons?+

Only Adobe Substance 3D Painter appears in comparison queries, averaging 61 across 4 evaluations. The absence of other brands in head-to-head queries indicates either sparse audit coverage or a market too fragmented for AI models to consistently pair alternatives.

More in Design

UI/UX Design Prototyping Video Editing 3D & CAD

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Graphic Design?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Graphic Design leaderboard →