AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in UI/UX Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 281 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 281 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
1/80
Not Visible · Survey Tools Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in UI/UX Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Optimal is visible in
3Your visibility gap
Optimal surfaces in 1/80 Survey Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 79 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Optimal Workshop has strong B2B AI citation signals via first-party comparison pages (e.g., /compare/optimal-vs-dovetail) and clear public pricing ($199/mo Starter; Enterprise “Let’s talk”). The biggest AI visibility risk is category-usecase discovery for survey tools (especially non-profit, healthcare, employee engagement, and event planning) where the brand is currently not appearing in shortlist answers—fix by publishing targeted, crawlable “survey tools for [use case]” pages with evaluation-style Q&A blocks.
Based on audit of optimalworkshop.com · Jul 29, 2026