AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Infrastructure
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 315 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 315 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Infrastructure
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories UXArmy is visible in
2Executive summary
UXArmy is a B2B user research/UX testing SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (130 reviews, 4.7/5 on its G2 product page) and solid Capterra presence (23 reviews, 4.5/5). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while UXArmy hosts first-party comparison content (e.g., Lookback vs UXArmy), there’s no clear evidence of a dedicated, crawlable “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” comparison hub and there’s no confirmed SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured-data footprint from live checks—so AI engines may rely on third-party review sites instead of your own evaluation pages.
Based on audit of uxarmy.com · May 7, 2026