[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/UXArmy
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 315 prompts

AI Share of Voice

5%

across 315 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
185 category
Cited2%3/185
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories UXArmy is visible in

2
  • Feedback Managementnot yet measured→
  • Product Experiencenot yet measured→

Executive summary

UXArmy is a B2B user research/UX testing SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (130 reviews, 4.7/5 on its G2 product page) and solid Capterra presence (23 reviews, 4.5/5). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while UXArmy hosts first-party comparison content (e.g., Lookback vs UXArmy), there’s no clear evidence of a dedicated, crawlable “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” comparison hub and there’s no confirmed SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured-data footprint from live checks—so AI engines may rely on third-party review sites instead of your own evaluation pages.

Based on audit of uxarmy.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy