[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/UXPin
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

39

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

37

across 341 prompts

AI Share of Voice

37%

across 341 prompts

Category Visibility

#9

in Prototyping · of 172

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

31/80

Challenger · Prototyping Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
205 category
Cited49%100/205
Share of voice28%avg
Engine consensus37%of engines
Competitors15.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories UXPin is visible in

2
  • Prototyping9 of 172→
  • UI/UX Design13 of 193→

Your visibility gap

UXPin surfaces in 31/80 Prototyping discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 49 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim UXPin →

Executive summary

UXPin is already a visible “Challenger” in prototyping shortlists (31/80 discovery prompts), and it has meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., 118 reviews on G2, 26 on Capterra, 21 on TrustRadius). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing first-party evaluation content that answers prototyping workflow questions (e.g., collaboration, interactive prototypes, agile teams) in a way models can quote—so it’s often forced to cite generic third-party sources instead of UXPin pages.

Based on audit of uxpin.com · Jun 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy