AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in Prototyping
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals39/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
37
across 341 prompts
AI Share of Voice
37%
across 341 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
31/80
Challenger · Prototyping Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Prototyping
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
UXPin surfaces in 31/80 Prototyping discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 49 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
UXPin is already a visible “Challenger” in prototyping shortlists (31/80 discovery prompts), and it has meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., 118 reviews on G2, 26 on Capterra, 21 on TrustRadius). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing first-party evaluation content that answers prototyping workflow questions (e.g., collaboration, interactive prototypes, agile teams) in a way models can quote—so it’s often forced to cite generic third-party sources instead of UXPin pages.
Based on audit of uxpin.com · Jun 10, 2026