Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Category · AI Citation Index

Data & Analytics

The Data & Analytics category demonstrates remarkable consensus, with 317 brands recognized and zero prompt variation—every major LLM recommends the same foundational tools. Tableau and Snowflake dominate at 60%+ shortlist rates with maximum model diversity (4/4), signaling these platforms have become non-negotiable infrastructure. The top 8 brands all achieve perfect model diversity, suggesting the category has matured into a stable hierarchy where visualization (Tableau, Looker, Power BI), cloud data warehousing (Snowflake, Databricks), and hyperscaler platforms (Microsoft, Google Cloud) form distinct but universally acknowledged tiers.

663 discovery queries · 656 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 663 buyer-style "Data & Analytics" queries

22%33%44%55%66%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces68%72%77%81%85%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Data & Analytics sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Tableau
29/29
2Microsoft
27/29
3Snowflake
26/29
4Looker
23/29
5Data Platform
22/29
1Tableau
11/16
2Microsoft
11/16
3Looker
9/16
4Snowflake
9/16
5Stacks
8/16
1Microsoft
14/15
2Tableau
13/15
3Snowflake
11/15
4Looker
11/15
5Stacks
9/15
1Microsoft
12/13
2Snowflake
8/13
3Stacks
8/13
4Tableau
8/13
5Looker
8/13
1Attribution
11/11
2Google Analytics 4
10/11
3Northbeam
10/11
4Looker Studio
9/11
5Looker
9/11
1Tableau
9/10
2Snowflake
8/10
3Looker
7/10
4Microsoft
6/10
5Looker Studio
5/10
1Microsoft
9/9
2Tableau
8/9
3Stacks
7/9
4Snowflake
6/9
5Databricks
5/9
1Tableau
7/8
2Snowflake
7/8
3Stacks
7/8
4Microsoft
6/8
5Looker
6/8
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · data-analytics

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 4/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand018355370Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 4/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Data & Analytics prompt runs.

Vendor pages

253

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

207

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Data & Analytics questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Data & Analytics?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Data & Analytics leaderboard →