Category · AI Citation Index

Data & Analytics

The category reveals a bifurcated market structure. Enterprise data infrastructure (Tableau, Snowflake) achieves 60%+ shortlist rates with moderate model diversity (4), indicating strong consensus around these platforms for core BI and warehousing needs. Product analytics tools (Mixpanel at 29%, Heap at 13%, Hotjar at 9%, Fullstory at 7%) show maximum model diversity (5), suggesting these solutions address more specialized, context-dependent use cases where buyer requirements vary significantly. The 158 consensus brands versus only 12 evaluation brands indicates this is a mature category with established preferences rather than active exploration.

663 discovery queries · 609 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 8, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 663 buyer-style "Data & Analytics" queries

3%10%17%24%31%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%74%82%89%97%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Data & Analytics sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Tableau
29/29
2Snowflake
26/29
3Looker
23/29
4Databricks
21/29
5Microsoft
19/29
1Comprehensive
12/16
2Insights
11/16
3Recommend
11/16
4Tableau
11/16
5Microsoft
11/16
1Comprehensive
14/15
2Recommend
14/15
3Microsoft
14/15
4Tableau
13/15
5Insights
12/15
1Snowflake
8/13
2Tableau
8/13
3Looker
8/13
4Databricks
6/13
5Qlik
4/13
1Attribution
11/11
2Segment
10/11
3Looker
9/11
4Tableau
9/11
5Mixpanel
8/11
1Tableau
9/10
2Snowflake
8/10
3Looker
7/10
4Databricks
4/10
5Thoughtspot
4/10
1Microsoft
9/9
2Tableau
8/9
3Insights
7/9
4Snowflake
6/9
5POINT
5/9
1Tableau
7/8
2Insights
7/8
3Snowflake
7/8
4Recommend
7/8
5Microsoft
6/8
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · data-analytics

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 6/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand018355370Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 6/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Data & Analytics prompt runs.

Vendor pages

253

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

206

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Data & Analytics questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Data & Analytics?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Data & Analytics leaderboard →