AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in ETL & Data Integration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 353 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 353 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in ETL & Data Integration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Coalesce is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (4.7/5 from 21 reviews) and multiple first-party customer stories with concrete outcomes. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage queries like “Coalesce pricing” and evaluation comparisons like “Coalesce vs dbt” because the first-party pricing page is form-gated (no public tiers) and first-party comparison coverage appears limited/unclear from crawlable signals.
Based on audit of coalesce.io · May 6, 2026