Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Headless CMS

The headless CMS market shows strong consensus around three leaders—Contentful, Sanity, and Storyblok—each shortlisted in roughly two-thirds of evaluations with identical model diversity (4), suggesting broad cross-industry appeal. A second tier emerges with Prismic and Strapi near 48%, followed by Directus at 38%, indicating differentiation likely driven by deployment preferences (cloud vs. self-hosted) and developer experience priorities. The 18-brand consensus pool against only 12 evaluation brands reveals a fragmented market where buyers recognize many options but concentrate serious consideration on a narrow set.

173 discovery queries · 260 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 173 buyer-style "Headless CMS" queries

0%25%50%75%100%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces72%77%82%87%92%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Headless CMS sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Contentful
7/7
2Sanity
7/7
3Storyblok
7/7
4Directus
5/7
5Contentstack
3/7
1Contentful
7/7
2Sanity
7/7
3Channels
5/7
4Storyblok
5/7
5Strapi
4/7
1Contentful
6/6
2Sanity
6/6
3Storyblok
6/6
4Prismic
6/6
5Directus
3/6
1Contentful
6/6
2Sanity
6/6
3Storyblok
6/6
4Prismic
4/6
5Default
3/6
1Contentful
4/4
2Sanity
4/4
3Storyblok
4/4
4Prismic
4/4
5Default
3/4
1Contentful
4/4
2Sanity
4/4
3Storyblok
4/4
4Directus
3/4
5Stable
2/4
1Contentful
4/4
2Sanity
4/4
3Storyblok
4/4
4Prismic
3/4
5Directus
3/4
1Contentful
4/4
2Sanity
4/4
3Channels
4/4
4Webflow
3/4
5Default
2/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · headless-cms

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 29/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07142027Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 29/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

555 citations captured across Headless CMS prompt runs.

Vendor pages

275

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

132

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Headless CMS questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Headless CMS?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Headless CMS leaderboard →