[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Magnolia
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

11

across 325 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 325 prompts

Category Visibility

#18

in Headless CMS · of 28

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
191 category
Cited8%15/191
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus42%of engines
Competitors25.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Magnolia is visible in

2
  • Headless CMS18 of 28→
  • Web CMS22 of 49→

Executive summary

Magnolia is already a credible B2B CMS/DXP citation target (e.g., 37 G2 reviews and 119 TrustRadius reviews, plus Gartner Peer Insights pages exist), so it can show up in evaluation-stage answers. The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “direct answer” capture: ensure first-party, crawlable evaluation content (especially pricing + SoftwareApplication/FAQ schema) so AI engines can cite magnolia-cms.com instead of only third parties.

Based on audit of magnolia-cms.com · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy