AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in Headless CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 331 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 331 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Headless CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Magnolia is visible in
2Executive summary
Magnolia is already a credible B2B CMS/DXP citation target (e.g., 37 G2 reviews and 119 TrustRadius reviews, plus Gartner Peer Insights pages exist), so it can show up in evaluation-stage answers. The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “direct answer” capture: ensure first-party, crawlable evaluation content (especially pricing + SoftwareApplication/FAQ schema) so AI engines can cite magnolia-cms.com instead of only third parties.
Based on audit of magnolia-cms.com · Jun 3, 2026